{"id":32022,"date":"2025-02-06T11:38:32","date_gmt":"2025-02-06T07:38:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cue.edu.ge\/?post_type=articles&#038;p=32022"},"modified":"2025-05-21T16:24:46","modified_gmt":"2025-05-21T12:24:46","slug":"measuring-circular-economy-in-the-european-union-based-on-a-composite-indicator","status":"publish","type":"articles","link":"https:\/\/cue.edu.ge\/en\/articles\/measuring-circular-economy-in-the-european-union-based-on-a-composite-indicator\/","title":{"rendered":"Measuring Circular Economy in the European Union Based on a Composite Indicator"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"detail-content\"><strong>\u10d0\u10d1\u10e1\u10e2\u10e0\u10d0\u10e5\u10e2\u10d8<\/strong><\/div>\n<div class=\"detail-content\">In the European Union, circular economy has received increasing attention, because of its potential to break with unsustainable production and linear consumption models. The concept of the circular economy came to the fore in the 1960s and typically changes depending on the political, geographical, territorial, social and cultural context. In terms of its operational process, the circular economy, as opposed to the linear economy, sees the economy as a sustainable economic system. The system separates economic growth from the use of resources by reducing the use of natural resources and, in a way, recycling them.<\/div>\n<div class=\"detail-content\">\n<p>Making progress and measuring performance in the circular economy as an integral part of sustainable development is quite a difficult task, as is getting countries, in this case, the 27 EU Member States, to adapt to this economic model. Measuring the level of implementation of circular economy strategies is still at a relatively early stage, which means that despite efforts, not all countries use the same indicators to measure them. Despite the development of a wide range of indicators, there is inconsistency in their purpose, scope and potential application.<\/p>\n<p>This study examines the circular economy indicators for the 27 Member States of the European Union to develop composite indicators at the Member State level. The research objective can be achieved with the help of secondary data from Eurostat&#8217;s central database, which is specific to the circular economy. The 25 indicators are structured around four themes, forming the composite indicator&#8217;s basis. The composite results for the 27 EU Member States show that Belgium, Germany, Denmark and the Netherlands top the rankings, with Romania, Croatia and Malta at the bottom. The existence of these results means that it is easy to measure the performance and ranking of EU Member States in terms of the circular economy.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"detail-content\"><strong>\u10e1\u10d0\u10d9\u10d5\u10d0\u10dc\u10eb\u10dd \u10e1\u10d8\u10e2\u10e7\u10d5\u10d4\u10d1\u10d8:<\/strong>\u00a0circular economy, European Union, composite indicator<\/div>\n<div class=\"detail-content\"><strong>JEL:<\/strong>\u00a0Q01, Q56<\/div>\n<div class=\"detail-content\"><strong>DOI:<\/strong>\u00a010.52244\/c.2024.11.5<\/div>\n<div class=\"detail-content\">\n<h4><a href=\"https:\/\/cue.edu.ge\/Articles_pdf\/7acb89eb36776a3f4322f8076205321b.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>\u10e1\u10e2\u10d0\u10e2\u10d8\u10d0<\/strong><\/a><\/h4>\n<h4><\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"detail-content\">\n<p><strong>\u10d2\u10d0\u10db\u10dd\u10e7\u10d4\u10dc\u10d4\u10d1\u10e3\u10da\u10d8 \u10da\u10d8\u10e2\u10d4\u10e0\u10d0\u10e2\u10e3\u10e0\u10d0:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Garc\u00eda-Barrag\u00e1n, J. F., Eyckmans, J., &amp; Rousseau, S. (2019). Defining and Measuring the Circular Economy: A Mathematical Approach.\u00a0<em>Ecological Economics, 157<\/em>, 369-372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ecolecon.2018.12.003<\/p>\n<p>Halstenberg, F. A., Lindow, K., &amp; Stark, R. (2017). Utilisation of product lifecycle data from PLM systems in platforms for industrial symbiosis.\u00a0<em>Procedia Manufacturing, 8<\/em>, 369-376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclepro.2019.05.044<\/p>\n<p>Janik, A., &amp; Ryszko, A. (2019). Circular economy in companies: an analysis of selected indicators from a managerial perspective.\u00a0<em>Mape, 2<\/em>(1), 523-535. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2478\/mape-2019-0053<\/p>\n<p>Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., &amp; Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualising the circular economy: an analysis of 114 definitions.\u00a0<em>Resources, Conservation &amp; Recycling, 127<\/em>, 221-232. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.resconrec.2017.09.005<\/p>\n<p>Kozma, D. E., Moln\u00e1r, T., &amp; Moln\u00e1rn\u00e9 Barna, K. (2022). The indicator-based measurement of the circular economy in the countries of the European Union.\u00a0<em>T\u00e9r \u00e9s T\u00e1rsadalom, 36<\/em>(2), 49-69. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17649\/TET.36.2.3374<\/p>\n<p>Mathews, J. A., &amp; Tan, H. (2016). Circular economy: lessons from China.\u00a0<em>Nature, 531<\/em>, 440-442.<\/p>\n<p>Moln\u00e1r, T. (Eds.). (2018).\u00a0<em>T\u00e1rsadalmi, gazdas\u00e1gi strukt\u00far\u00e1k region\u00e1lis jellemz\u0151i. A Nyugat-Dun\u00e1nt\u00falon.<\/em>\u00a0OmniScriptum Scriptum \u2013 GlobeEdit.s<\/p>\n<p>Momete, D. C. (2020). A unified framework for assessing the readiness of European Union economies to migrate to a circular modelling.\u00a0<em>Science of the Total Environment, 718<\/em>, 1-9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.scitotenv.2020.137375<\/p>\n<p>Niskanen, J., Anshelm, J., &amp; McLaren, D. (2020). Local conflicts and national consensus: The strange case of circular economy in Sweden.\u00a0<em>Journal of Cleaner Production, 261<\/em>, 1-9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclepro.2020.121117<\/p>\n<p>Pearce, D. W., &amp; Turner, R. K. (Eds.) (1990).\u00a0<em>Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment.<\/em>\u00a0John Hopkins University Press.<\/p>\n<p>Potting, J., Hekkert, M., Worrell, E. &amp; Hanemaaijer, A. (2017).\u00a0<em>Circular Economy: Measuring Innovation in the Product Chain \u2013 Policy Report.<\/em>\u00a0PBL Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency.<\/p>\n<p>Robaina, M., Murillo, K., Rocha, E., &amp; Villar, J. (2020). Circular economy in plastic waste \u2013 Efficiency analysis of European countries.\u00a0<em>Science of the Total Environment, 730<\/em>, 1-12. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.scitotenv.2020.139038<\/p>\n<p>The Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (Eds.) (2013).\u00a0<em>Towards a Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for Accelerated Transition.\u00a0<\/em>The Ellen MacArthur Foundation.<\/p>\n<p>Vanham\u00e4ki, S., Virtanen, M., Luste, S., &amp; Manskinen, K. (2020). Transition towards a circular economy at a regional level: A case study on closing biological loops.\u00a0<em>Resources, Conservation &amp; Recycling, 156<\/em>, 1-11. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.resconrec.2020.104716<\/p>\n<p>Wang, P., Kara, S., &amp; Hauschild, M. Z. (2018). Role of manufacturing towards achieving circular economy: the steel case.\u00a0<em>CIRP Annals, 67<\/em>, 21-24. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cirp.2018.04.049<\/p>\n<p>Washington, H. (Eds.) (2015).\u00a0<em>Demystifying Sustainability: Towards Real Solutions.<\/em>\u00a0Routledge.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"gonisdziebebi":[100],"class_list":["post-32022","articles","type-articles","status-publish","hentry","gonisdziebebi-2024-en"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cue.edu.ge\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles\/32022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cue.edu.ge\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cue.edu.ge\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/articles"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cue.edu.ge\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"gonisdziebebi","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cue.edu.ge\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/gonisdziebebi?post=32022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}