{"id":35636,"date":"2025-12-17T17:18:33","date_gmt":"2025-12-17T13:18:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cue.edu.ge\/?post_type=articles&#038;p=35636"},"modified":"2025-12-17T17:20:31","modified_gmt":"2025-12-17T13:20:31","slug":"the-impact-of-technological-solutions-on-the-project-cycle-digital-transformation-and-sustainability-in-management","status":"publish","type":"articles","link":"https:\/\/cue.edu.ge\/en\/articles\/the-impact-of-technological-solutions-on-the-project-cycle-digital-transformation-and-sustainability-in-management\/","title":{"rendered":"The Impact of Technological Solutions on the Project Cycle: Digital Transformation and Sustainability in Management"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Lela Kurashvili<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ph. D. Student, Lecturer, GIPA<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"mailto:lelakurashvili03@gmail.com\">lelakurashvili03@gmail.com<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In today\u2019s global environment, technological transformation and the adoption of digital solutions play a crucial role in reshaping project management practices. The aim of this study is to analyze how technological tools influence the stages of the project cycle and how they affect organizational sustainability.<\/p>\n<p>The research examines the integration of digital platforms, artificial intelligence, data analytics, and automation as key components in project planning, monitoring, and evaluation. Findings reveal that modern technologies enhance transparency, reduce decision-making time, and strengthen team coordination across the project lifecycle.<\/p>\n<p>Special emphasis is placed on the importance of partnerships and collaboration: cooperation with technology companies enables organizations to adopt advanced practices and adapt to global changes. The study also highlights that organizations should foster an innovation-oriented culture, granting employees the freedom to test and implement new ideas.<\/p>\n<p>The scientific contribution of this work lies in offering an integrated analytical model that bridges classical project management approaches with technological innovations. In practical terms, the results demonstrate that the purposeful use of technological solutions increases project efficiency, reduces resource misallocation, and reinforces sustainability mechanisms.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, the paper confirms that digital transformation is no longer an optional tool but an essential requirement for the successful implementation of modern projects and the achievement of long-term sustainability.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Keywords:<\/strong> Technological solutions, Project cycle, Digital transformation, Sustainability, Innovation<\/p>\n<p><strong>JEL:<\/strong> O32, M15, L86, Q01<\/p>\n<p><strong>DOI: <\/strong>10.52244\/c2025.25<\/p>\n<p><strong>The article is in Georgian.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>References<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Turner, J. R. (2014). <em>Handbook of project-based management<\/em>. McGraw-Hill.<\/p>\n<p>Project Management Institute. (2021). <em>A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK\u00ae guide)<\/em> (7th ed.). Project Management Institute.<\/p>\n<p>Kerzner, H. (2017). <em>Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling<\/em>. Wiley.<\/p>\n<p>International Project Management Association (IPMA). (2020). <em>ICB4-Individual competence baseline<\/em>. IPMA.<\/p>\n<p>Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., &amp; McAfee, A. (2014). <em>Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation<\/em>. Harvard Business Review Press.<\/p>\n<p>Project Management Institute. (2021). <em>The impact of digitalization on project management<\/em>. Project Management Institute. [\u10d2\u10d0\u10d3\u10d0\u10db\u10dd\u10ec\u10db\u10d4\u10d1\u10e3\u10da\u10d8\u10d0: 2025-08-19]<\/p>\n<p>Silvius, G., &amp; Schipper, R. (2014). <em>Sustainability in project management<\/em>. Gower Publishing.<\/p>\n<p>United Nations. (2015). <em>Sustainable development goals<\/em>. UN Publishing. [2025-08-19]<\/p>\n<p>Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. <em>Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28<\/em>(2), 118\u2013144. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jsis.2019.01.003\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jsis.2019.01.003<\/a><\/p>\n<p>OECD. (2020). <em>Digital transformation in the public sector<\/em>. OECD Publishing. [2025-08-19]<\/p>\n<p>Kettunen, P., &amp; Kalliokoski, J. (2021). Digital transformation of project management practices. <em>International\u00a0Journal\u00a0of\u00a0Project\u00a0Management,\u00a039<\/em>(5),\u00a0441-453. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijproman.2021.02.001\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijproman.2021.02.001<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Project Management Institute. (2019). <em>Pulse of the profession: The future of work-Leading the way with PMTQ<\/em>. Project Management Institute. [2025-08-19]<\/p>\n<p>Kotter, J. (1996). <em>Leading change<\/em>. Harvard Business School Press.<\/p>\n<p>Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. <em>MIS Quarterly, 13<\/em>(3), 319-340. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/249008\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/249008<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Rogers, E. M. (2003). <em>Diffusion of innovations<\/em> (5th ed.). Free Press.<\/p>\n<p>Serrador, P., &amp; Turner, R. (2015). The relationship between project success and project efficiency. <em>Project Management Journal, 46<\/em>(1), 30-39. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pmj.21468\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pmj.21468<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Marnewick, C. (2016). <em>Information system project success<\/em>. Routledge.<\/p>\n<p>Silvius, A. J. G. (2017). Integrating sustainability into project management competences. <em>PM World Journal, 6<\/em>(2), 1-13.<\/p>\n<p>Martens, M. L., &amp; Carvalho, M. M. (2017). Key factors of sustainability in project management context. <em>International\u00a0Journal\u00a0of\u00a0Project\u00a0Management,\u00a035<\/em>(6),\u00a01084-1102. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijproman.2016.11.005\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijproman.2016.11.005<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Besson, P., &amp; Rowe, F. (2012). Strategizing information systems-enabled organizational transformation: A transdisciplinary review and new directions. <em>Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21<\/em>(2), 103-124. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jsis.2012.05.001\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jsis.2012.05.001<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., &amp; Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. <em>MIT Sloan Management Review, 14<\/em>(3), 1-12. [2025-08-19]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"gonisdziebebi":[103],"class_list":["post-35636","articles","type-articles","status-publish","hentry","gonisdziebebi-2025-en"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cue.edu.ge\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles\/35636","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cue.edu.ge\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cue.edu.ge\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/articles"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cue.edu.ge\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35636"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"gonisdziebebi","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cue.edu.ge\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/gonisdziebebi?post=35636"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}