Ana Kakabadze
Quality Assurance Manager, Central University of Europe
Abstract
The origins of artificial intelligence trace back to the 1950s, John McCarthy organized a two-month workshop at Dartmouth College in the United States. It was in the proposal for this 1956 workshop that McCarthy first introduced the term “artificial intelligence.”. As a formal field of academic inquiry, it was established in 1956 during the Dartmouth Conference.
Quality assurance departments of higher education institutions are beginning to explore the potential of artificial intelligence in enhancing implementation of internal mechanisms. While AI holds considerable promise for enhancing the accuracy, efficiency and transparency of quality assurance processes, there remains a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding how these tools are utilized.
The study aims to explore the current level of adoption of AI-based tools within quality assurance processes and to assess their perceived effectiveness, identify the key challenges, analyze the perceived risks associated with over-reliance on AI, understand the types of institutional support required to facilitate a successful and responsible integration of AI tools, explore expectations for the future role of AI in quality assurance.
As technologies based on artificial intelligence continue to evolve, it is important to assess how higher education institutions are preparing for the integration of more advanced AI-driven solutions and what steps they are taking to overcome the potential barriers to successful implementation.
A mixed-methods approach, incorporating both qualitative and quantitative research methods, was employed in this study. The survey was distributed to academic staff, administrative personnel and students. A total of 48 representatives from 28 universities across Georgia and Europe participated in the research.
The research reveals evolving landscape of integration artificial intelligence into internal quality assurance mechanisms. While a significant portion of respondents indicate that AI tools are not yet utilized in their institutions, there is a growing recognition of their potential effectiveness, particularly in enhancing efficiency . Concerns over data reliability, software costs, ethical compliance, personnel readiness, and the interpretability of AI-generated outcomes illustrate that the road to integration is neither straightforward nor universally embraced. Additionally, the perceived risks, such as over-reliance on AI, loss of human oversight, data security vulnerabilities, and resistance from institutional staff, highlight the need for a balanced and thoughtful approach to digital transformation in quality assurance.
The findings of this study are particularly relevant for higher education policymakers, quality assurance professionals and staff involved in the design and implementation of internal quality assurance systems.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Internal quality assurance; AI in Quality Assurance; Digital Transformation; Higher Education.
JEL: I23; I21; O33
DOI: 10.52244/c2025.19
References
Alenezi, Mamdouh & Wardat, Saja & Akour, Mohammed. (2023). The Need of Integrating Digital Education in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Sustainability. 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064782.
Balalle, Himendra, and Sachini Pannilage. “Reassessing Academic Integrity in the Age of AI: A Systematic Literature Review on AI and Academic Integrity.” Social Sciences & Humanities Open 11 (2025): 101299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101299
Barus, Okky Putra, Achmad Nizar Hidayanto, Eko Yon Handri, Dana Indra Sensuse, and Chairote Yaiprasert. “Shaping Generative AI Governance in Higher Education: Insights from Student Perception.” International Journal of Educational Research Open 8 (2025): 100452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100452.
Bates et al. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (2020) 17:42 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00218-x
Chaika, Oksana. (2023). Role of AI in higher education. Молодь і ринок. https://doi.org/10.24919/2617-0825.6/214.2023.
Foltynek, T., S. Bjelobaba, I. Glendinning, et al. “ENAI Recommendations on the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in Education.” International Journal of Educational Integration 19, no. 12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00133-4.
Gustilo, L., E. Ong, and M. R. Lapinid. 2024. “Algorithmically-Driven Writing and Academic Integrity: Exploring Educators’ Practices, Perceptions, and Policies in AI Era.” International Journal of Educational Integration 20 (3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00153-8.
Hennesy (2023, April 3). Over 40% of Cambridge students use ChatGPT for academic work. Varsity. Retrieved from https://www.varsity.co.uk/news/25463
Ifenthaler, Dirk & Majumdar, Rwitajit & Gorissen, Pierre & Judge, Miriam & Mishra, Shitanshu & Raffaghelli, Juliana Elisa & Shimada, Atsushi. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Implications for Policymakers, Researchers, and Practitioners. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 29. 1693-1710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09747-0
Manatos, Maria & Sarrico, Cláudia & Rosa, Maria. (2017). An integrative approach to quality management in higher education? The TQM Journal. 29. 342-356. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-01-2016-0009.
McCarthy, John, Marvin L. Minsky, Nathaniel Rochester, and Claude E. Shannon. A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. 1955. https://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/dartmouth/dartmouth.html.
Murtaza, Mohsin & Cheng, Chi-Tsun & Albahlal, Bader & Muslam, Muhana & Raza, Mansoor. (2025). The impact of LLM chatbots on learning outcomes in advanced driver assistance systems education. Scientific Reports. 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91330-3
Okky Putra Barus, Achmad Nizar Hidayanto, Eko Yon Handri, Dana Indra Sensuse. 2025. ” Shaping generative AI governance in higher education: Insights from student perception.” International Journal of Educational Research Open 8-10.
Quality and Qualifications Ireland (QQI). NAIN Generative AI Guidelines for Educators. 1st ed. August 2023. https://www.qqi.ie/sites/default/files/2023-09/NAIN%20Generative%20AI%20Guidelines%20for%20Educators%202023.pdf.
Russel, S., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial intelligence – a modern approach. New Jersey: Pearson Education
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). (2015). Brussels, Belgium.
Zapata, Gabriela & Saini, Akash & Tzirides, Anastasia Olga & Cope, Bill & Kalantzis, Mary. (2024). The Role of AI Feedback in University Students’ Learning Experiences: An Exploration Grounded in Activity Theory. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal. 18. 1-30. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-9795/CGP/v18i02/1-30.
Oye, Emma & Frank, Edwin & Owen, Jane. (2024). Ethical Considerations in AI-Driven Education.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhao, Haoyu. (2024). Digital Platforms in Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Strategies. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. 116. 118-122. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/116/20242447.
Zhao, Ting. (2023). AI in Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202311 0106.v1