Monetary Hypocrisy – Case Against the USD Hegemony

Following the 2008 financial crisis, China and the BRICS efforts to contest the supremacy of the U.S. dollar by advocating for an alternative monetary framework, particularly trade with national currencies. This paper explores the fundamental contradictions inherent in these initiatives, positing that it is both disingenuous and conceptually flawed for authoritarian regimes—characterized by the absence of democratic governance and rule-based legal systems—to champion a rule-based international financial architecture. Such governments, which stifle transparency and accountability within their borders, are ill-suited to cultivate a stable and just global monetary system. Moreover, the emphasis on national currency trade, particularly involving China, is likely to result in the dominance of the Yuan, as no nation in the Global South possesses nearly the same level of export capacity and economic clout as China. Consequently, rather than establishing a more equitable system, these initiatives reinforce China’s monetary authority and underscore the contradictions of authoritarian states advocating for a rule-based order that they do not uphold.

საკვანძო სიტყვები: International monetary order, Bretton Woods Conference, USD hegemony, Rise of China, alternative monetary order.

JEL: E3, E4, E5

DOI: 10.52244/c.2024.11.4

სტატია

გამოყენებული ლიტერატურა:

Armijo L. E, (2019): The Monetary and Financial Powers of States: Theory, Dataset, and Observations on the Trajectory of American Dominance. New Political Economy. DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2019.1574293;

Barry E (2023) – Currency Conflict: Dollar Dominance, Contemporary De-Dollarization and The Chinese Yuan’s Place in The Global Economy. Keck Center for International and Strategic Studies, Arthur R. Adams Fellowship in International Political Economy. Claremont McKenna College.

Bordo M. D (2020) – The Imbalances of the Bretton Woods System 1965 to 1973: U.S. Inflation, the Elephant in the Room. Open Economies Review.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-019-09574-2

Federal Reserve Bulletin (1951). Volume 37. Number 3. – https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/files/docs/publications/FRB/pages/1950-1954/17720_1950-1954.pdf [Last Access 06/09/2024];

Saull R. (2012) – Rethinking Hegemony: Uneven Development, Historical Blocs, and the World Economic Crisis. International Studies Quarterly (2012), 1–16. Queen Mary, University of London.

Statista.com – https://www.statista.com/chart/27688/chinas-share-of-global-gdp-vs-the-us-and-the-eu/ [Last Access 06/09/2024];

Statista.com – https://www.statista.com/chart/30838/share-us-us-dollar-in-global-economy-global-financial-transactions/ [Last Access 06/09/2024];

Statista.com – https://www.statista.com/statistics/1334676/wwii-annual-war-gdp-largest-economies/ [Last Access 06/09/2024];

Statista.com – https://www.statista.com/statistics/1348683/wwii-us-lend-lease-war-dept-aid-by-country-and-category/ [Last Access 06/09/2024];

thomsonreuters.com – https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/editorcharts/GLOBAL-MARKETS-DEBT/0H001QXG796N/index.html [Last Access 06/09/2024];

Tomaihi S. (2024) – BRICS Currency and Dollar Hegemony: Passing of the Torch.  CUNY City College. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cc_etds_theses/1160/ [Last Access 06/09/2024]